In Timbs v. Indiana the Supreme Court ruled
Group of answer choices

since Timbs' car was worth much more than the fines, the fines could be paid for with the car.

that states could impose excessive fines as long as due process was followed.

that seizing Timbs' car was an example of excessive fines and that portion of the Eighth Amendment applies to the states.

that the Indiana Supreme Court's decision on the Timbs case was in line with the Eighth Amendment.