The Ethicist column in New York Magazine, authored by the philosopher Kwame Anthony Appiah, provides a platform for readers to seek advice on moral quandaries. Through philosophical reasoning and cultural awareness, the column analyzes ethical dilemmas, offering practical guidance for personal and societal challenges. In this assignment you will engage with a recent article from the ethicist "Is It Wrong to Bring a Child Into Our Warming World Download Is It Wrong to Bring a Child Into Our Warming World" by Kwame Anthony Appiah. In your paper, you must accomplish the following goals: 1) Describe the ethical dilemma posed by reader and explain the basic position Appiah gives in response. Identify any moral assumptions he seems to be making in his answer. 2) Define and explain both the utilitarian and Kantian moral theories, and then determine whether Appiah's stance leans more towards one of these perspectives. Support your analysis with clear references from the article. 3) Develop your own solution to the dilemma as if you were writing The Ethicist column and giving a response to the person who has written in. Employ insights from both utilitarian and Kantian frameworks to craft a thoughtful and well-reasoned resolution. Construct at least two separate arguments supporting your viewpoint. Remember, this article is chiefly over whether there are ethical reasons not to have children. Feel free to explore this topic beyond the specific case of environmental degradation and whether there might be other circumstances in which it would be unethical to reproduce. Your response should demonstrate a deep understanding of the ethical theories, the article's content, and your capacity to synthesize these elements to offer a balanced and rational conclusion. Do feel free to challenge and object to Appiah's answer or any assumptions that are being made in the article. Answer in 2500 words please.