analyze the following scenarios, and determine whether the verdict for each are valid or unconstitutional if you think the Averdick unconstitutional, be sure to identify which constitutional rights were violated, Alice Watergate has lived in her home of over fifty years, but times are changing and her once small
town is growing by leaps and bounds. She now finds herself and her property smack dab in the
middle of progress. The city wishes to build a new shopping mall and the state wishes to add some
new interstate roads, but her house is in the way. Both the city and the state have contacted her and
offered her the market value of her estate. She refuses all their offers. After a long drawn out
process and warning by both the municipality and the state, Alice is forcibly evicted from her property
and is compensated based on the average cost of a home like hers. Her house is destroyed and
construction on the roads and shopping mall commence before Alice can take her case to trial. She
tries to seek more damages through a civil trial, citing the emotional turmoil this situation has caused
her. The judge who is appointed by the governor, throws out her case claiming she was already fairly
compensated for the property.