LOS ANGELES, California (Achieve3000, May 8, 2017). Dozens of police departments are putting together their own DNA databases. Police are glad. They say having their own databases helps them solve crimes faster. But others are not happy. They say some departments are using genetic samples in a way that is unfair. A DNA database is a collection of DNA samples. DNA is found in cells. It stores each person's genetic information. Sometimes, DNA is found at crime scenes. That happens when hair, skin, or bodily fluids have been left behind. Finding DNA helps police. They can compare it with other people's DNA in their databases. This allows police to see if there is a match. This might link a person to a crime. There are regulations that control how state and federal DNA databases can be managed. Police often have to arrest a person before a sample can be entered into state and federal collections. But local police databases do not have these same rules. Some cities allow samples to be taken from adults who have never been arrested. Samples can even be collected from children. But police must have the children's (or their parents' or guardians') permission. Police chiefs like having their own DNA databases. It helps them solve cases faster. State and federal databases are often backlogged. Therefore, DNA samples are not processed quickly enough. Frederick Harran works in public safety in Bensalem, Pennsylvania. Bensalem has its own database. The database was created in 2010. Since then, crime has gone down. Harran says this is because of DNA collection. The state lab can take 18 to 24 months to process DNA. With their database, police use a private lab. They get results within a month. Timing is important, Harran argues. He says that someone might keep committing crimes while police wait for results. Some people agree that collecting DNA helps keep people safe. But others have a problem with the practice. They don't like the fact that samples can be taken from people who are not suspected of serious crimes. They say that collecting DNA samples goes against people's right to privacy. It threatens a person's dignity. They also argue that city police can target certain people for samples. Police are supposed to have permission before collecting DNA. But some say a person might feel forced into giving a sample. After all, if a police officer asks for something, many people would say yes. They may do so out of fear of being arrested. This fear may be greater for minors. But police say that databases help keep the public safe. Branford, Connecticut, has only 500 samples in its collection. Still, Police Chief Kevin Halloran says the samples are a great help. The database has helped solve crimes. It has helped rule out people as suspects. Halloran says that people must freely agree to give samples. And they do not take samples from minors. "It's not like we're pulling over [drivers] and asking them for DNA," Halloran said. "There has to be some sort of [link] to a crime." Information for this story came from AP. QUESTION 2 2 / 8 Suppose you were writing a summary of the Article. Which of these would be most important to put in the summary