Read Akana's "Scott Pilgrim vs. the world" and evaluate Akana's use of sources For what purpose does Akana use these specific sources (movie reviews)? Do the sources hurt or help his argument? How effective is his response to an opposing view? Explain why you feel it is effective or not. If not, what could Akana have done better to support his claims?

a) To provide historical context
b) To critique the cinematography
c) To support arguments and analysis
d) To introduce the main characters