STATE OF UTAH v. PLANNED PARENTHOOD ASSOCIATION OF UTAH
Web link: https://www.acluutah.org/cases/planned-parenthood-association-utah-v-state-utah-2022

I have difficulty writing a hypothesis for this case, and my professor has sent it back five times. I am confused about how to do it.

Hypothesis: The legal changes from "Roe v. Wade" to "Dobbs v. Jackson," along with triggered state laws such as the Utah abortion ban, affect the ethical aspects of women's healthcare access, including affordable and safe reproductive healthcare access. Abortion would be harder to obtain and potentially infringe upon individuals' rights to accessible healthcare while raising questions about the legislation's alignment with constitutional principles.

(I had changed it to this ) The legal and ethical decisions stemming from the Planned Parenthood Association of Utah v. State of Utah (2022) case may have significant implications for the availability and affordability of reproductive healthcare services in Utah. Specifically, we anticipate that restrictions or expansions on reproductive rights established through legal proceedings will directly influence the accessibility of services, patient autonomy, and overall reproductive health outcomes for individuals within the state. (But he said no.)

how can I better the hypothesis