A student is writing an essay about NASA's shuttle program. Read the draft of the essay and answer the question that follows.

The shuttle program should never have ended. NASA was silly to make that decision. All three remaining shuttles could have taken more than 50 flights
each based on their designs. That's enough for years of exploration, research, and repairs. It's true that two of the shuttles failed, resulting
in the tragic loss of life of several astronauts, but that failure rate is no greater than any of the other manned NASA programs. Besides, danger is inherent in space travel. We can't learn and grow without taking chances. And without a shuttle program,
vital equipment such as the
Hubble telescope and the International Space Station will degrade and finally fail.

The writer wants to change the sentence "NASA was silly to make that decision" to make it more fair and objective. Which revised sentence
will work best?

The decision by NASA was incredibly shortsighted.

NASA really made the wrong move with this decision.

NASA's decision was based on emotions and not science.

There is clear evidence that explains why NASA's decision was a mistake.