Respuesta :
General motors' stand against apartheid in south africa was based upon what came to be known as sullivan principles.
Further Explanation:
Sullivan principles:
The Sullivan principles are the names of two corporate implicit rules, created by the African-American evangelist Rev. Leon Sullivan, advancing corporate social obligation: The first Sullivan standards were created in 1977 to apply financial weight on South Africa in dissent of its arrangement of politically-sanctioned racial segregation.
lawful noteworthiness of the Sullivan case:
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, lawful case in which, on March 9, 1964, the U.S. Preeminent Court administered consistently (9–0) that, for a defamation suit to be fruitful, the complainant must demonstrate that the culpable articulation was made with 'genuine vindictiveness' that is, with information that it was false or with neglectful negligence.
the decision in New York Times v Sullivan:
In a consistent choice, the United States Supreme Court decided for the New York Times. So as to demonstrate criticism, an "open authority" must demonstrate that the paper acted "with 'genuine malevolence' that is, with information that it was false or with careless dismissal" for truth.
Subject: history
Level: college
Keywords: Sullivan principles, lawful noteworthiness of the Sullivan case, the decision in New York Times v Sullivan.
Related links:
Learn more about evolution on
https://brainly.com/question/2014445
https://brainly.com/question/5633352
General Motors' stand against apartheid in South Africa was based upon what came to be known as Sullivan Principles.
Further Explanations:
The Sullivan principles denote the commercial codes of behaviour, established by the African-American evange list “Rev. Leon Sullivan” pointing at fostering commercial social concerns.The original Sullivan principle was developed in 1977 to impose economic pressure on South Africa regarding the abolishing of the Apartheid system. It was also postulated to apply monetary weight on South Africa in its organization of politically-sanctioned racial exclusion.
“New York Times Co.” versus “Sullivan”, case of 9th March, 1964, of the Court ruled that the complainant must reveal that the culpable enunciation was made with genuine malice that is, the information that presented was false or with neglectful carelessness. In a reliable choice, the Supreme Court gave the ruling in errand of the New York Times. So to exhibit criticism, an "open authority" must validate that the paper submitted.
Learn more
- How did California differ from the United States in terms of interactions between whites and natives?https://brainly.com/question/7248802
- The development of the shipbuilding and cod fishing industries during the colonial era would have had the greatest impact on which colony?https://brainly.com/question/4995968
- What was the main reason joseph Stalin created collective farms? Soviet farms were old-fashioned and inefficient. Collective farms would create many new jobs. Farmland could be turned into industrial land. Wasteful crop surpluses would be eliminated. https://brainly.com/question/381562
Answer Details
Grade: High school
Subject: History
Chapter: Sullivan principles
Keywords:
Sullivan principles, lawful of the Sullivan case, the decision in New York Times v Sullivan,Sullivan principles, African-American, Rev. Leon Sullivan, Sullivan principle, Apartheid system,open authority
