Constitutionality of the War Powers Act While each branch of government performs valuable and interesting roles on its own, fascinating results emerge when the branches interact with each other. You learned about the constitutional controversy around the War Powers Act in this unit. Congress passed this act as a response to a widespread perception that presidents had abused their power during the Vietnam War. Since that time, many have questioned the constitutionality of the War Powers Act, including every president up through George W. Bush. Those for it argue that Congress has the right to oversee foreign policy matters. Those against it believe it infringes on the president’s constitutional role as commander in chief of the armed forces. In this task, you will analyze the constitutionality of a particular power of a branch of the government, using the War Powers Act as your example. Part A Imagine that the president has deployed forces to intervene in a civil war in the Middle East. The purpose of the deployment is to protect the civilians in a large city from an imminent attack by their own government. The president claims that this urgent use of military force falls within the powers of the presidency as commander in chief, but does not reach the level of involvement that requires Congress to declare war. The president does not formally consult with Congress before ordering military action and does not provide a report to Congress in a timely manner. In response, the House Armed Services Committee declares that the president violated the War Powers Act, demands that the president remove the troops, and formally brings the case to the Supreme Court to force action from the president. You are a justice on the Supreme Court preparing to hear the case. Start by writing down your initial reactions to the situation. Based on what you know of the War Powers Act, which branch appears to be in the right? What questions would you ask during oral arguments to try to get each side to explain its point of view?