Respuesta :
These two speeches are very different in their purpose, their tone and their use of rhetorical appeals. In the first example, the Queen uses extremely emotional and inflammatory language. She wants to convince the troops of her support and her dedication, and she also wants to demonstrate that she understands their fears and she suffers them equally. On the other hand, the second example is significantly less emotional and a lot more rational and pragmatic.
When comparing the two excerpts shown above, we can see that the first excerpt is focused on being an emotional speech, while the second excerpt is focused on being a rational speech.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The first excerpt is part of a speech with a persuasive tone.
- In this speech, the queen makes strong use of pathos, to persuade the listeners, through the appeal to emotion.
- In this speech, the queen establishes an emotional and responsible connection with soldiers, allowing them to understand that she understands them.
- The second excerpt has a rational and rigid tone.
- In this speech, the queen makes a strong appeal to ethos, reinforcing the authority she represents.
- In this speech, she wants to position herself as a ruler capable of understanding and participating in political processes with mastery.
With this, we can ensure that Elizabeth was a great speaker and knew how to express herself appropriately for each occasion.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/13889?referrer=searchResults
