Respuesta :
Hello 601,
The correct answer you are looking for is A summarizing. This strategy works best because in its process you only summarize the key points you need in order to comprehend it to its optimal.
My choice here would be d. metacognition.
A comparative analysis allows supporting such conclusion. This is a very sensitive and critical issue: the robotization of medicine in order to preserve and/or extend the life of a human being. Normally humans prefer to be operated by humans and here that is not exactly the case, a human patient is being operated directly by a robot. Of course, that robot is being controlled and manipulated by a human operator, a human doctor but the doctor is not touching the flesh. As much as people support technological advances they would not be automatically be willing to accept that minor surgeries be performed through the intermediary of a machine. It would be irresponsible for the journalist to make inferences about the benefits or the disadvantages of such approach, as it would be irresponsible to make predictions without enough experimentation, testing and trials in order to do fully understand the validity of the technique. Summarizing would not do justice to the new technology as it would most likely omit important aspects for the public.
Metacognition in the other hand would be a great way of vulgarizing a complex procedure. Meta cognition provides a deepened analysis of knowledge and methods in so much that it induces a self-awareness about them in terms of both efficiency and moral/ethical standing. In more layman’s terms, metacognition would entail properly researching the ethical and procedural pros and cons of using human-operated robotic assistants to perform minor surgeries on human beings. If after such research the procedure proves to be beneficial to the said human beings by such parameters, this technique would benefit enormously from a the inevitably good public perception of the procedure that a press article would generate by properly educating the public on all of its facets, both negative and positive. The public always appreciates to be kept in the loop and not to be patronized as being incapable of studying and evaluating new knowledge.