Dave Granlund would agree with Nadia Arumugam in the following points:
* They both talk about how banning wouldn't work because that'd make people more attracted to buy or obtain the item.
*And they both state the point of people looking for more places to get drinks instead of stopping getting them.
Dave Granlund and Nadia Arumugam both have concern that banning a drink would NOT lead to expcetd results that are desired.
Nadia expressed that a total ban is not an appropriate idea and authorities must focus on restricting the number of consumption.
Dave Granlund said that addiction of people would make them search for new places when the cap on consumption is applied at one place.
Therefore, both had this idea that banning won't work well rather would attract new people or make people not obey the law.
Learn more about Dave Granlund and Nadia Arumugam here:
https://brainly.com/question/16095354
