Respuesta :
Answer:
1)The pesticide measurements were the dependent variable.
Explanation:
The aim of the experiment was to determine whether the pesticides caused the fish kills. In this scenario, the dependent variable should have been the fish kills and not the pesticides. The amount of pesticides were supposed to be the independent variable.
Independent variables are the variables that change and cause an effect on the test subject or the dependent variable.
The dependent variable is not manipulated, but changes depending on the independent variable.
In a scientific inquiry, we often seek to investigate the impact of one variable on another. These variables in the study are known as dependent and independent variables.
In experimental research, the independent variable also known as(cause) is unaffected by other factors in your research.
The dependent variable is affected depending on the changes occurred in the independent variable, as such they are dependant on the independent variable.
In experimental research, the person carrying out the experiment manipulates or changes the independent variable to see what influence it has on the dependent variable.
From the given question, the experimenter wants to test and deduce whether the pesticides kill the fish in the farm pond.
Dependent variable = pesticides
However, the reason why they failed to get a reliable result in their conclusion is that they attribute the dependent variable which is the fish kill to the pesticides.
So, the true variables should be:
- The independent variable ⇒ is the pesticide
- The Dependent variable ⇒ is the death of the fish
Therefore, we can conclude that the best statement that describes why their conclusion is not reliable is in Option (1).
Learn more about experimental research here:
https://brainly.com/question/18242205?referrer=searchResults