Respuesta :
Answer:
New York Times V. United States 1971
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Times.
The government used the reasoning of national security by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.
The main result of the case was that the government couldn't say that there was a danger to the United States if they couldn't prove it.
Explanation:
The correct choices for the following statements are as below -
1. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of New York Times.
2. The government used the battery of reasoning of the national security's interests by preventing the New York Times from printing the documents.
3. The main result of the case was to show and prove that there is no such things as a threat to the national security and does not necessarily interest the national government if such article is being published in the newspaper.
Supreme Court rulings
- The New York Times versus the United States took place in the year 1971 when the US government abolished the printing of the article on the fact that the article violates the law of national security.
- However, in the judgement given by Supreme Court, it was held that the government and national security threat cannot be a reason if there are no evidences.
- In case when there are no evidences that clearly indicate the national security, the New York Times may not be refrained from publishing such article.
Hence, the correct set of choices that make the statement complete and match the statements appropriately are as given above.
To know more about the national security, click the link below.
https://brainly.com/question/2639721
