beba2019
contestada

Which of the best explains why the argument is this passage is weak?
The argument doesn’t take into account opposing points of view
The argument relies on attacking a weak version of the opposition
The claim is not valid
The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts

Respuesta :

mendezolivia333

Answer:” it’s the argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts”

Explanation: I took the test

arshikhan8123

The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts.

What are signs of a weak argument?

  • The Hierarchy of Disagreement.
  • Merely contradicting someone is pretty weak.
  • Refuting something that's not the main point is pretty weak, too.
  • The importance of identifying logical fallacies.
  • Key Takeaways.

What makes a weak inductive argument?

An inductive argument can always be stronger, always be weaker. Generally, if there is more than a 50-50 chance that the conclusion will follow from the (presumed) truth of the premises, then it is strong; otherwise, it is weak.

Learn more about weak arguments here https://brainly.com/question/21361323

#SPJ2

Otras preguntas