Respuesta :
Answer:
The correct answer is C.The Supreme Court has opposed restrictions on spending on politics.
Explanation:
In 2010, the supreme court had decided against no putting any limit on the amount of money that the corporations can give to the political action committee. They did this decision in the Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission case. So, what they did with this decision is to oppose restrictions to spend on politics.
The true statement about spending in politics is that the Supreme Court has opposed restrictions on spending on politics.
Why does the Supreme court oppose restrictions to spending in politics?
This is due to the fact that the first amendment to the constitution of the country has opposed laws that would restrict corporate fundings for candidate elections.
Given the ruling that is based on the amendment, we can agree that the right answer is the third option.
Read more on election here: https://brainly.com/question/1330417