A state might hold a primary instead of a caucus because a primary is ________.

inexpensive and simple
transparent and engages local voters
faster and has higher turnout
highly active and promotes dialog during voting

A state might hold a primary instead of a caucus because a primary is transparent and engages local voters. This is reasonable because, the person running for the position would have a better chance of getting votes from primary, rather than caucus.

Answer Link

JackelineCasarez JackelineCasarez · Answer 2 · 2021-10-26T20:15:38+02:00

The reason for which the state is more likely to clinch a primary rather than a Caucus because the primary is:

b). transparent and engages local voters.

'Caucus' is described as the 'preliminary meeting of the members of a political party in order to nominate public candidates.'
While 'primary' involves 'election of a candidate belonging to a political party through votes.'
As the definitions themselves clarify, the primary has transparency without any flaw as it involves community voters that increase the validity of the candidate while the caucus might be manipulated or based on the preference.

Thus, option b is the correct answer.

Learn more about 'Voters' here:

brainly.com/question/8308940

A state might hold a primary instead of a caucus because a primary is ________. inexpensive and simple transparent and engages local voters faster and has higher turnout highly active and promotes dialog during voting

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

A state might hold a primary instead of a caucus because a primary is ________.

inexpensive and simple
transparent and engages local voters
faster and has higher turnout
highly active and promotes dialog during voting