The Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with two students who
were suspended from school for wearing black armbands to protest the
Vietnam War. Their parents sued the school district for violating the students'
right to free speech, but it was determined by lower courts that the school
district had the right to suspend them. When the Supreme Court reviewed the
case, it decided that the school district did not have the right to suspend the
students.
Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the
Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands
to school?

In the Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines, the argument that remains least effective in supporting the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear armbands to school was that other court cases upheld the right to limit freedom of expression.

What was the case of Tinker v. Des Moines about?

The Supreme Court concluded in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that public school administrators cannot limit student speech unless they can foresee it legitimately disrupting school operations or invading the rights of others.

What is meant by freedom of expression?

In order to exercise your freedom of expression, you must be able to do so without hindrance and without regard to geographical boundaries.

You are therefore free to acquire information, other people's thoughts and expressions, as well as to express yourself in a variety of ways online.

To learn more about freedom of expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/397185

#SPJ2