Answer:
The statement that proves to be true is that the researcher will not interact with the participants.
Explanation:
The reason to support the statement is because the researcher should not be conducting any behavior as he/ she wishes to find genuine types of interaction that may lead to the main goal which is to show cooperation between peers. If there was anything planned or spoken between peers and researcher, then the latter would not be ethic when going through the observation method to gather the information that is intended to be used.
Answer:
The correct answer for the exercise: A researcher wants to observe preschoolers at a local public playground to evaluate levels of cooperation. The researcher will not interact with the children or record information in such a manner that the identity of the subjects can be readily ascertained. is: This research won't require IRB review because it would be eligeble for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is set in a public setting.
Explanation:
Ok, this question is very difficult, but I am going to do my best to answer it: First of all, let's analyze it. The researcher is conducting research based on scientific observation and operational description. This means that the researcher is going to watch the behavior of his population in the natural environment he wants to study them and without having more action than pure observation. He also will use this information to record the behavior of a certain topic "cooperation". He is not going to control anything and he will observe what the population does. So, because is making a field observation without any variable control or personal intervention. He doesn´t require an institutional review board review for his study, because it is not biased. Unless he doesn't know how to perform operational description.
