Respuesta :
Answer:
Moral Relativism
Explanation:
Relativistic point of view is the conviction that there is no essential fact of the matter and what is genuine is accepted by specific individual or culture. Various individuals will have various convictions about what is correct and what's not.
Activity of an individual prompts certain outcome on self as well as other people so individuals utilize moral reasoning so as to make the best choice.
Moral decisions make the individual to act as needs be found on the circumstances that may be correct or wrong and will have various results.
In this way, moral reasoning is the way toward deciding the distinction among good and bad in a given circumstance.
Answer:
Maria exhibited moral relativism.
Explanation:
Moral relativism stands for an idea that there’s no such a thing as an absolute set of morals. It’s a version of morality that says “to each her own,” and those who follow it say, “Who am I to judge?”
Moral relativism can be understood in a few ways. For example, there is cultural relativism. It says that moral standards are culturally defined. There is also some common values that seem nearly universal, such as honesty and respect, but many differences appear across cultures when people evaluate moral standards around the world.
Societies make their moral choices based on their own customs and beliefs. People tend to believe that the “right” moral values are the values that exist in their own culture.
Normative moral relativism has the idea that all societies should accept each other’s differences in moral values, because there are no such things as universal moral principles. Philosophers don’t agree. Let’s say forbidding a woman to have a job is okay in some cultures, that doesn’t necessarily mean that other cultures cannot rightfully condemn it.
