Based on what you have read, write two or three sentences explaining whether James Cross Giblin shows historical figures in a biased or unbiased way.

Young made several mistakes. He thought the third hieroglyph was part of the one for “T,” whereas it actually stood for the vowel “O.” The fourth hieroglyph, the lion, meant just “L,” the fifth meant “M,” and the last hieroglyph stood simply for “S.” In other words, the spelling in Egyptian was “Ptolmis,” not “Ptolemaios.”

But Young got three out of the seven symbols right, which was a better score than any scholar before him had achieved.

Young published his findings in an article written for the 1819 supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica. He continued to work on the problem of the hieroglyphs in the years that followed, but made little headway in deciphering additional names and words. Why? Largely because he was working under a false assumption.

Like countless other scholars over the centuries, Young still believed that most of the hieroglyphs must have a symbolic meaning. Only in special cases, such as foreign names, did he think that they were used to represent sounds.

Because of this mistaken belief, Young put roadblocks in his own path. However, he had laid a solid groundwork for others in their attempts to decipher the hieroglyphs. And a young Frenchman, Jean-Francois Champollion, was ready to take up the challenge where Young had left off.

Respuesta :

im a whole year late but the answer is

he shows that with great power comes great respomsiblity

A possible answer to this question is:

In this particular excerpt, James Cross Giblin shows historical figures in an unbiased way. Although he does use words such as "better" and "mistaken", he is not really conveying his opinion. The evidence he gives throughout the excerpt supports the claims he makes about Young's attempts to decipher hieroglyphs.

  • This question refers to the book "The Riddle of the Rosetta Stone," by James Cross Giblin.
  • The excerpt we are analyzing here discusses Young's attempts to decipher hieroglyphs, one of the writing systems used in Ancient Egypt.
  • In the passage, Giglin provides evidence to support his statements.
  • The author is not simply giving his opinion. He is stating facts, even if they do contain an evaluative streak.
  • For instance, when he says that Young did better than other scholars, that can be proven true. He was able to decipher 3 out of the 7 symbols, which no scholar had achieved before.
  • In conclusion, the excerpt is unbiased.

Learn more about the topic here:

https://brainly.com/question/16575296?referrer=searchResults

Ver imagen mcarc09