A study has results that seem fine, but there is no clear association to social change. What is missing? A correlation test was conducted to determine whether a relationship exists between level of income and job satisfaction. The sample consisted of 432 employees equally represented across public, private, and non-profit sectors. The results of the test demonstrate a strong positive correlation between the two variables, r =.87, p < .01, showing that as level of income increases, job satisfaction increases as well.

Meaningfulness of articulations : The statements are legitimate for the examination aside from one actuality that whether equivalent portrayal of workers crosswise over open, private and non-benefit is substantial.

We realize that example ought to speak to the populace. Here it is taken equivalent circulation of workers crosswise over different areas which may not be valid in the reality.

The rate portion of open, private and non-benefit parts are not similarly appropriated. Subsequently it would be progressively significant if the example is taken pretty much in a similar extent that is illustrative of the extent of open, private and non-benefit segments. For this specific situation, a pilot study or study can be made to know the rate appropriation of representatives in these segments.

Statistical Importance : The p-esteem is not exactly [tex]\alpha[/tex] = 0.01. Subsequently we can dismiss the invalid speculation ( accepting it ) that there is no connection between's pay level and employment fulfillment, i.e., we finish up the way that there is a relationship between level of income and job satisfaction depending on the given information.

Suggestion for social change : While it isn't 100% genuine that higher pay level consistently guarantees high job fulfillment level, still from social perspective the facts confirm that low income can never provide work fulfillment though a decent pay can possibly give satisfaction of employment.