contestada

NEED HELP ASAP!!!!
Which of the following best explains the difference between two predominant theories of the origins of language?

A.
Most linguists believe that current languages have shared roots, while Quentin Atkinson believes they developed individually in isolation.

B.
Most linguists believe that languages primarily developed in isolation, while Quentin Atkinson believes they developed in superfamilies.

C.
Some linguists believe that all languages came from Indo-European, while Quentin Atkinson believes that they stemmed from African languages.

D.
Some linguists believe that current languages were once joined in superfamilies, while Quentin Atkinson believes that all languages can ultimately be traced to Africa.

E.
All linguists believe that current languages belong to the same superfamily, while Quentin Atkinson believes that they all belong to different families of African languages.

Respuesta :

The statement best explains the difference between two predominant theories of the origins of language is that some linguists believe that current languages were once joined in super families, while Quentin Atkinson believes that all languages can ultimately be traced to Africa.

  • According to the researcher, the Early human being is traced back to Africa.
  • From Africa, early humans spread to the rest often continents.
  • The origin of language has been found its link from Africa.
  • According to Quentin Atkinson, the origin of languages could be traced back to Africa.
  • Over time languages changed as words change from one region to another.

Therefore we can conclude that language emerged from Africa.

Thus option D. is the correct answer.

Learn more about " language " here:

brainly.com/question/2093542

Otras preguntas