A research collaboration can be enhanced by:
a. Avoiding the issue of which journal to target since research team members might disagree.
b. Waiting to discuss authorship issues until after data collection.
c. Limiting the communication between researchers and industry partners.
d. Discussing intellectual property issues while the collaboration is forming.

Explanation: It is essential to address some of the negative aspects associated with the increase in scientific collaboration, particularly unjustified hyperauthorities and the contradiction between accrediting systems and the valuation of individual merits of products that are the result of cooperative practices. In this sense, it is important to analyze the value of the signatures in the publications and their use, developing a Sociology of the attribution of scientific merit, since it is computed differently according to the scientific areas or branches; as well as deepening the study of the conflict that arises from the growth of the collective mode of knowledge production and prevalence in relation to the professional promotion of individual rewards and recognition.