In writing a blog about his favorite smoothie shop, Daniel claims that their smoothies are healthy, enjoyable after-school snacks.

Fruit-and-yogurt smoothies not only contain the recommended daily serving of fresh fruit but also are good sources of protein. Delicious smoothie flavors come from combining many different types of fresh fruit. Because they are blended with ice, smoothies are an excellent way to cool down on a hot day. Best of all, all-natural fruit smoothies taste better than sugary processed foods.

Is Daniel’s evidence sufficient to support his claim? Why or why not?

A.
The evidence is sufficient because it gives a nutritional breakdown of fruit smoothies.
B.
The evidence is sufficient because it gives details about nutrition, flavor, and other benefits.
C.
The evidence is not sufficient because it does not mention the types of fruit that are used in the smoothies.
D.
The evidence is not sufficient because it focuses on fruit smoothies but does not give information about other snacks.

Respuesta :

Answer:

c

Explanation:

It gives a brief description but says nothing about tue fruits used. I'm sorry if it's wrong

The statement that asserts the sufficiency of Daniel's evidence would be as follows:

B). The evidence is sufficient because it gives details about nutrition, flavor, and other benefits.

  • The evidence proposed by Daniel to back his claim regarding the nutritional content of the fruit-and-yogurt smoothies could be considered adequate.
  • The reason behind this is that it logically states that they offer a better taste, nutrition, flavor, and several other advantages in comparison to processed food items.
  • This establishes the validity of the claim and allows the readers to consider them as the alternative to other cold drinks or mocktails in summer.

Thus, option B is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Blog" here:

brainly.com/question/1668333

Ver imagen JackelineCasarez