Answer:
a. fraudulent misrepresentation.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario in order to recover the price of the bird and the cost of fines, Sophie can sue Henry for fraudulent misrepresentation. This term refers to when an individual uses false statements in order to convince someone to enter into a formal contract. Which seems to be the case in this scenario since Henry lied about the bird not being on an endangered species list in order to close the sale.
If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly