Is the following more aptly described as a simile or an analogy?

"To be able to procure its own entertainments, and to subsist upon its own stock, is not the prerogative of every mind. There are, indeed, understandings so fertile and comprehensive, that they can always feed reflection with new supplies, and suffer nothing from the preclusion of adventitious amusements; as some cities have within their own walls enclosed ground enough to feed their inhabitants in a siege. But others live only from day to day, and must be constantly enabled, by foreign supplies, to keep out the encroachments of languor and stupidity."
—Samuel Johnson

Respuesta :

The main difference of simile and analogy is simile used comparison to make the description more emphatic and vivid ,( example  : Sneaky as a snake, strong as a tank)

We can't find this kind of language on the paragraph above.

So, that paragraph above is more aptly described as an : analogy

hope this helps

Answer:

Analogy

Explanation:

Samuel Johnson is explaining his idea of boredom and to explain it  , he compares the state of being bored with the life in a city. First, he claims that there are people who can get entertained by themselves and , if they happen to get bored with this entertainment, they will bear it and even become reflective. These people have the mental capacity to do so. This is compared to a walled city that has got enough food for her inhabitants in case of a military siege. The walled city refers to the individual who can cope with his own entertainment and boredom, and the food with the mental ability to do so. The same applies to the comparison between people who depend on external factors to set boundaries to their stupid entertaitment or to keep them away from boredom ; and a city which needs foreing supplies to survive.