Respuesta :
Answer:
D) Their behaviors are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture.
Explanation:
The "nature versus nurture" debate is a centuries-old debate about what determines human behavior. This debate becomes more heated when discussing the actions of certain individuals that have been universally reviled, like dictator Adolf Hitler, serial killer Ted Bundy, and Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh. Were they born "evil", or did they become "evil". According to researcher Matt Riley, on his Nature via Nurture book, the relation between nature and nurture isn't one dominating over the other, or a simple causal relationship of one creating the other. Rather, there exists a dialectical relationship between both. In other words, the behaviors of the men listed above are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture, where each one of these can't explain their actions alone and by itself. Rather, it is the interaction between their genetic makeup and their particular life experiences that created their personalities.
Answer:
D) Their behaviors are the result of the interaction of nature and nurture.
Explanation:
The nature vs. nurture debate is a popular debate in the social sciences when determining the causes of an individuals' behaviors, actions and personality. If someone's behavior or personality results from their 'nature', it means that their genetics and internal biological factors lead to their behavior. On the other hand, if someone's behavior or personality results from their 'nurture', this means that environmental and external factors such as socialization, family environment, living conditions, etc., lead to their behavior.