camillehart
contestada

Please Help!!!! Brainliest!!!

List three ways the Roman Republic was different from a monarchy ruled by a single king. Use what you learned about the structure of the Roman government earlier in the lesson.

Respuesta :

A) Roman Republic was unable to control the vast empire while the monarchy could easily control the empire. B) There was a proper division of power between the different organisation which were assemblies of the government but there could be hardly two classification in the imperial age. C) Dictators could control the situation of emergency while the republic could not.

Explanation:

Roman republic was like democracy in Rome where the power was divided into assemblies. There were three assemblies in which the power could be divided to govern the country. But these were very slow in taking the decision and therefore could not handle the emergency situations very easily.

On the other hand, when there was only one emperor or dictator, it was very easy to control the power and the empire. Since the decision had to be taken by only one person, it could be taken very easily and could manage the emergency situations. This was the time when Rome was ruled by only one ruler and was known as the imperial age.

Deep4529

Answer:

Actually pasted answer off of Edmentum!!!

Explanation:

1. A king is not elected. He gets his power by birth or by his control over the military. The Roman Republic had assemblies to elect its leaders.

2. A king has absolute power. He makes laws and decisions that no one can question. In the Roman Republic, no one had such power. The consuls’ power was limited by their one-year terms. Each consul could overrule the other.

3. In a kingdom, there is no limiting the king’s power. If the king is cruel, he can treat his subjects badly. In the Roman Republic, there were laws to protect the rights of citizens. The tribunes could reject unfair decisions by the patricians.

Otras preguntas