Answer:
False. It is an inductive, weak argument.
Explanation:
The given statement is not deductive and valid, because it derives its conclusion only from limited evidence that U.N. is presented in a negative light in this isolated statement.
The other example, is a survey of students meal choice preferences in the campus canteen. Only because 75% of students in a sample group of 100 said that they do not support availability meat-based meals in the canteen, does not mean that 75% of all students do not support availability meat-based meals as well.