contestada

How did courts once interpret the equal protection clause to rule in favor of
laws that segregated white Americans and African Americans?
O
A. They argued that equal protection required groups of citizens to
be protected from one another if the groups disagreed.
O
B. They decided that equal protection referred only to laws that
affected citizens' fundamental rights, such as freedom of speech.
O
C. They argued that only the federal government was required to
provide equal protection of the laws.
O
D. They claimed that the laws treated both groups equally because
neither could use the services and facilities designated for the
other group.

Respuesta :

D. They claimed that the laws treated both groups equally because

neither could use the services and facilities designated for the

other group.

They claimed that the laws treated both groups equally because neither could use the services and facilities designated for the other group.

The answer is option D.

How did the courts interpret the Equal Protection Clause?

The Supreme Court determined that 'separate however equal' become illegal below the same protection clause because states had no longer, in truth, provided all people the same safety of the laws.

After the Slaughterhouse instances, the courtroom interpreted the identical Safety Clause to consist of the equality function and the Due technique Clause to offer the substantial protections once theorized to be a part of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth amendment.

Learn more about Supreme Court here: https://brainly.com/question/6111641

#SPJ2