Investigator Robbins is charged with collecting DNA from a crime scene. What piece of evidence would not be useful for DNA testing?
Saliva from a discarded cigarette butt
The suspect's boot prints in the mud
A stray hair found clasped in the victim's hand
Tape used to cover the victim's mouth

There would be no DNA in the mud just shape of the boot. The hair spray would have the victims finger prints, the tape would most likely have the suspects finger prints, and the saliva is obviously DNA

Answer Link

hotrodmcstud hotrodmcstud · Answer 2 · 2020-02-07T17:28:15+01:00

hotrodmcstud hotrodmcstud

07-02-2020

Answer:

The suspect's boot print in the mud.

Explanation:

The boot print in the mud is by-far the least likely to carry any samples of DNA or other genetic materials.

Answer Link

Investigator Robbins is charged with collecting DNA from a crime scene. What piece of evidence would not be useful for DNA testing? Saliva from a discarded cigarette butt The suspect's boot prints in the mud A stray hair found clasped in the victim's hand Tape used to cover the victim's mouth

Respuesta :

Otras preguntas

Investigator Robbins is charged with collecting DNA from a crime scene. What piece of evidence would not be useful for DNA testing?
Saliva from a discarded cigarette butt
The suspect's boot prints in the mud
A stray hair found clasped in the victim's hand
Tape used to cover the victim's mouth