Answer:
D) The statements employ inductive reasoning
Explanation:
Before explanation, let's first quickly define the given choices.
Valid reasoning is the correct conclusion made from correct premises.
Sound reasoning is the resoning that can be fairly easily understood and that follows some sort of logic.
Deductive reasoning is the reasoning from the general to the specific.
Inductive reasoning is the reasoning from the specific to the general.
Unlike deductive, inductive reasoning can lead us to wrong conclusions. It starts with a specific observations and from them conclude a general rule.
In this case, the observation is that serious injuries occur during unsanctioned matches. Using inductive reasoning, we could make the general rule that all the injuries occur during unsanctioned matches, however, it, obviously, might not be true.
Answer:
The answer for this problem is
C) Most fans want to witness the raw and brutal battles of "no holds barred" matches, and don't care about proper enforcement of the rules.
