contestada

Increasing the share of your income that you save is good for you. Therefore it would be good for the whole economy if everyone saved more. This exemplifies the:
A. Post hoc fallacy
B. Fallacy of composition
C. Use of loaded terminology
D. Confusion between correlation and causation

Respuesta :

Answer:

B. Fallacy of composition.

Explanation:

Fallacy of composition arises when you assume that what is happening to a part of a group will happen to the whole group as well. In this case, the predicament for an individual: "if you save more of your income it is good for you" is being assumed for the whole economy, which may or may not be true.

Answer:

B.Fallacy of Composition

Explanation:

Fallacy of composition is inferring that when one something is true for one part of the the group it should be true for all / some parts of the group.like in this case believing that if saving is good for you if everyone saves it will be good for the whole economy.