Which of the following was a criticism of the idea that the best and brightest citizens would provide the most proper representation in the U.S. democracy? A. It might be difficult to maintain an oligarchic democracy with representation from only the best citizens. B. The "natural aristocracy," which includes the average citizen, might not be very good at identifying the problems of the common people. C. The only candidates with sufficient resources to be elected would be working men from the middle classes. D. It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy."

The system of democracy which asserts that the best and brightest citizens (individuals of natural aristocracy) would provided proper representation is criticized because It might be hard for voters to really tell which candidates are truly of the "natural aristocracy." In a population of over 300 million people, it will be hard for the average American voter to identify individuals who are of natural aristocracy, who broke the norm and standout among their peers as such individuals may be confused by those of artificial aristocracy who have the finance, family name and obtained polished education.

bratislava bratislava · Answer 2 · 2022-02-25T13:36:12+01:00

It might be hard for the voters to tell which of the candidates are true of the "natural aristocracy." Thus the option A is correct.

What are the natural autocracies ?

The aristocracy is a Greek word for power and strength. Refers to the ruling classes and is based on the meaning of the rule of the best. A natural astromancy s not a separate form of state is an integrated part of the large body of the constitution and is formed on the basis of the legitimate basis. It makes generalities and is admitted for actual truth.

Find out more information about the representation.

brainly.com/question/17245188.