annehaga12
contestada

Which of the following best explains the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore? (3 points)


1-It decided that Florida's first recount should resume in all disputed counties until completed and Bush was the winner.


2-It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.


3-It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was appropriate according to the Constitution.


4-It decided that Florida's first recount was against the Constitution and states cannot order recounts in any future election.



WILL GIVE BRAINLIST

Respuesta :

I believe it is 2-It decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.

After some research i found the answer, i got banned on an old account by feminists. It'd be nice to have brainliest.

Please may i have brainliest

Wolfwastaken

Answer:

Your answer is B or the second option

Explanation:

The answer is B, Because Bush was winning by a very small amount of votes so they required a recount, but even though the recount in Florida was fair the way the recount was done was unfair, so state officials announced George Bush as the winner. Thus that makes B or the second option the answer.

Your Welcome, Have a great day, and please consider giving me a brainliest!

Otras preguntas