Respuesta :
Of all the given arguments, the one which is least effective in supporting the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school is that the school allowed students to wear other controversial symbols. Hence, Option A is correct.
What are armbands?
A piece of fabric worn around the arm is called an armband. They may be worn purely for adornment, to identify the wearer as a member of a group, as a badge of office or status, or as an indication that one is in a certain state or condition.
The petitioners claimed that the student's right to free speech was not violated by them wearing the armbands to class. The First Amendment applied to public schools, the Supreme Court held in favor of the armband-wearing pupils, and school administrators.
They could not limit student expression unless it interfered with the instructional process. The court determined that students' right to wear black armbands was protected by the First Amendment because doing so was not disruptive.
Thus, Option A is correct.
Learn more about armbands from here:
https://brainly.com/question/21786718
#SPJ2