what does the letter printed in The Times imply about the value of the jury system

The letter states that the jury has no more value than the verdict of a professional who knows the laws and can shine a case based on facts and facts.

Explanation:

The letter shown below shows that the author has reservations about the value of a jury's judgment. This is because the jury is formed by ordinary citizens, who see the judgment in a box and may not have the academic knowledge necessary to judge correctly. The author believes that the judgment made by a professional who will evaluate the facts and inferences based on his knowledge of the law has much more value than the judgment of the jury.

jayilych4real jayilych4real · Answer 2 · 2021-12-09T17:05:12+01:00

The thing which the letter printed in The Times implies about the value of the jury system is that

The Trial by Jury was not as effective as one which is made by a competent judge who has to go through all the facts

According to the given question, we are asked to show the thing which the letter printed in The Times implies about the value of the jury system .

As a result of this, we can see that from the given letter, the writer talks about the Trial by Jury being one of the sacred cows in the American judicial system as it was not effective because it had to do with twelve people who were huddled in a place for days or weeks to deliberate on a case.

He believes trial would be more efficient and effective if it was done by a competent judge who had taken his time to consider all the facts, rather than trial by jury.