Useful dialogues in moral reasoning usually involve numerous analogies and . In such dialogues, the nature and degree of rarely has undisputed consequences. Likewise, the modes of similarity between primary analogues and the are never relevant beyond dispute. However, these dialogues serve to illustrate the subtle effect that have on our thought processes and their power to alter our attitudes and perspectives. In these ways, analogies are effective tools for characterizing moral situations.

Respuesta :

Answer:

The analogical dialogue adds to the real dialogue the imaginative, transcendent facet, loaded with symbolic and connotative elements, bringing us closer to the multi-semantic nature of the concepts. Analogy, as an imaginative and creative resource, adds liveliness, fantasy.

Explanation:

The knowledge and use of analog processes results in the improvement of the four areas of language proficiency for the following reasons. In the first place, they promote the objectification of thought since analogical elaboration requires reflection and this, in turn, allows the appropriation of knowledge and facilitates its communicability. In this way, the territory of mere solipsistic speculation is abandoned and becomes a true mechanism of representation and transformation, that is, it places the subject in a reality capable of being modified. Likewise, it evidences the argumentative capacity of the issuer and opens the capacity for dialogue between thought and individual, between individual and reality and between subjects.

When the analogy is established, the narrow gates of human experience are opened, they are resized, they are given depth by revealing non-apparent meanings thanks to the relationship between essentially different beings. It is necessary to emphasize this last benefit, the analogy manages to surprise because it reveals contents that in a first examination may not be perceivable, but that unquestionably conform to the message and when not perceived, impose themselves on the receiver, leaving it at the mercy of the purpose of the message itself, locating it in a territory where questioning, dialogue or criticism are unlikely.