Answer:
the answer is A
Explanation:
Which part of the Tower Commission’s account makes Reagan’s innocence uncertain?
the answer is C
Why does Olson’s defense of Reagan leave matters uncertain?
the answer is D
How does Olson’s defense of Reagan match the story presented in "The Iran-Contra Affair
the answer is A
What makes North’s explanation of the Iran-Contra Affair more credible than anyone else’s in the investigation?
the answer is B
The correct option is A. By showing that the North had a central role the New York Times article supports the evidence presented in "The Iran-Contra Affair".
Impressed, Mr. Ledeen met Mr. Ghorbanifar, and this would mark the beginning of the Iran-contra affair. Well before Oliver L. North, a self-described "personal courier" for the White House, took over the Iran effort from him, a development he laments in "Perilous Statecraft," it was Mr. Ledeen who got the United States involved.
The Boland Amendment's coverage of "any other agency or institution of the United States engaging in intelligence activities" included the National Security Council, which was the subject of a significant legal dispute at the heart of the Iran-Contra scandal.
Oliver L. North makes a point of saying that "President Reagan knew everything" about the arms-for-hostages controversy in the Iran-contra incident, although passages from the book that have been made public today mention scant and ultimately unconvincing proof.
Congress sent the Contras $25 million in humanitarian aid in August 1985, with the condition that the State Department, not the CIA or the DOD, handle the money's administration. To provide humanitarian relief, President Reagan established the Nicaraguan Humanitarian Assistance Office (NHAO).
Learn more about The Iran-Contra Affair here:
https://brainly.com/question/3585170
#SPJ5
