in a given year, the rate of flu infection for the general public was 8.3%. And sample of 200 people who receive the flu vaccine, the rate of flu infection was just 3.5%. What conclusion should you draw?​

in a given year the rate of flu infection for the general public was 83 And sample of 200 people who receive the flu vaccine the rate of flu infection was just class=

Respuesta :

Answer:

[tex]\fbox{\begin{minipage}{10em}Option A is correct\end{minipage}}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Step 1: Define significance level

In this hypothesis testing problem, significance levels α is selected: [tex]0.05[/tex], the associated z-value from Laplace table:

Φ([tex]z[/tex]) = α - [tex]0.5 = 0.05 - 0.5 = -0.45[/tex]

=> [tex]z[/tex] = [tex]-1.645[/tex]

Step 2: Define null hypothesis ([tex]H_{0}[/tex]) and alternative hypothesis ([tex]H_{1}[/tex])

[tex]H_{0}[/tex] : rate of flu infection [tex]p[/tex] = 8.3% or 8.3/100 = 0.083

[tex]H_{1}[/tex] : rate of flu infection [tex]p[/tex] < 8.3% or 8.3/100 = 0.083

Step 3: Apply the formula to check test statistic:

[tex]K = \frac{f - p}{\sqrt{p(1 - p)} } * \sqrt{n}[/tex]

with [tex]f[/tex] is actual sampling percent, [tex]p[/tex] is rate of flu infection of [tex]H_{0}[/tex], [tex]n[/tex] is number of samples.

The null hypothesis will be rejected if [tex]K < z[/tex]

Step 4: Calculate the value of K and compare with [tex]z[/tex]

[tex]K = \frac{(\frac{3.5}{100}) - 0.083}{\sqrt{0.083(1 - 0.083)} } * \sqrt{200} = -2.46[/tex]  

We have [tex]-2.46 < -1.645[/tex]

=>This is good evidence to reject null hypothesis.

=> The actual rate is lower. (As [tex]H_{1}[/tex] states)

Hope this helps!

:)