ASAP If you chose Equilateral Equiangular Triangle Rotation to prove SAS Congruence, use the coordinates of your rotation to show that the two triangles are congruent by the SAS postulate. You can use the distance formula to show congruency for the sides. To show an angle is congruent to a corresponding angle, you can use slope or your compass and straightedge. (Hint: Remember when you learned how to copy an angle?) You must show all work with the distance formula for the corresponding pair of sides, and your work for the corresponding angles, to receive full credit.

diagram and the SAS Congruence Postulate to prove the two triangles are congruent. Explain Henry's mistake. LOGICAL REASONING Decide whether enough information is given to prove that the triangles are congruent. If there is enough information, tell which congruence postulate you would use.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps out

Answer Link

shubhamchouhanvrVT shubhamchouhanvrVT · Answer 2 · 2022-05-19T09:10:02+02:00

Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:

D. Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.

What is congruency?

The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.

An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.

See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.

Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.

The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".

Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:

D. Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.

Learn more about congruency at

brainly.com/question/14418374

#SPJ2