“United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:” Which of these inferences about voting laws is best supported by the following text? “The amendment, however, does not contain that word. It is limited to race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The legislature of the state of New York has seen fit to say, that the franchise of voting shall be limited to the male sex. In saying this, there is, in my judgment, no violation of the letter, or of the spirit, of the fourteenth or of the fifteenth amendment.” Question 46 options: a) The rules dictating who gets to vote in federal elections are completely separate from who gets to vote in state elections. b) It would have been illegal for Anthony to vote in a state assembly election as well because of her sex. c) The United States missed a big opportunity by not including women in the fifteenth amendment. d) Anthony could legally be elected to Congress even though she is not permitted to vote in a congressional election.

The implication of the case "United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling" is best supported by the text stated in option (d): "Anthony could legally be elected to Congress even though she is not permitted to vote in a congressional election."

What inference supports the case?

This is the assertion that is utilized to draw a conclusion about a certain thing based on the data at hand.

As a result, it is clear from the court case between Susan Anthony and the American government that Antony's defense claimed that the legalization of voting for all people was founded on the fact that women could become lawyers.

Therefore, Anthony thought that the legalization of women's suffrage in Illinois meant that everyone was now free to vote in all states. As a result, from the given options, the last option, that is option (d) is the correct answer.

Check the link to learn about United States v. Susan B. Anthony;

https://brainly.com/question/17160303

#SPJ2