United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:” Which of these inferences about Anthony’s defense is best supported by the text? Question 21 options: a) The center of their case was over whether voting is a privilege or a right. b) Anthony attempted to use the constitutional amendment giving African-American men the right to vote to justify her actions, but the judge did not agree. c) The defense believed that voting laws were not well-explained in the Constitution. d) Anthony believed that women being allowed to become lawyers in Illinois meant voting was now legal for everyone in all states.

Respuesta :

The inference that can be made about the United States v. Susan B. Anthony: Justice Ward Hunt's Court Ruling:” case, is that d) Anthony believed that women being allowed to become lawyers in Illinois meant voting was now legal for everyone in all states.

What is an Inference?

This refers to the statement that is used to come to a conclusion about a particular thing based on available evidence.

Hence, we can see that based on the court case between Susan Anthony and the American government, the defense of Antony stated that Antony's defense stated that voting was now legal for all based on the fact that women could become lawyers.

Read more about inferences here:

https://brainly.com/question/25280941

#SPJ1