Write a paragraph that interprets one of these sections from “A Computer Can Now Translate Languages as Well as a Human:”
“We’re still good for something”
“The best part of language is its quirks”

Use textual evidence and commentary to answer these questions in your response:

What is the author saying about language and the role of a human being in translating?
What textual evidence supports this idea?
How does this evidence support the idea?

Respuesta :

Answer:

In the section titled “We’re still good for something,” Ramirez argues that humans will still be more effective in translating certain words and phrases than a computer. The author states that “there are terms that exist in one language but not another, necessitating an explanation rather than a translation.” This means that a human may be needed to process how to explain a term that does not have an exact translation in another language.

Explanation:

its from edmentum so change it up a bit