Answer:
This is an actual court case that went all the way up to the Court of Appeals of Ohio's Ninth District.
It was a very complex case (it also included another case against Beacon for trying to gather information regarding the family, but it was ruled in their favor) were both sides appealed different decisions. The appeals court ruled 1 out of 14 assignments of error in favor of Akron beacon Journal, but it was a minor issue. Most of the original outcome was upheld, with the Irvines being assigned more than $100,000 in different types of damages + their attorney's fees.
Akron beacon Journal was found guilty of violating the Telephone Consumer Protection Act and invading the Irvines' privacy.
Using this type of machines are illegal and what makes things worse is that the marketing department of Beacon knew it wasn't working properly and they kept resetting it. It made a lot of calls to the Irvines at hours that no one would expect them, all after or before working hours. Their actions were deliberate since they were in desperate need of new subscribers to their newspaper.