Respuesta :
Answer:
I believe that Walter breached the contract because they failed to clean the sign, but I wouldn't consider it a material breach (this would be a non-material breach).
A material breach of a contract takes place when the breaching party does something (or fails to do something) that goes against the basic reason why the contract was signed. A material breach would be that Walter didn't provide the sign or that the sign never worked (didn't turn on). But in this case, the sign was a little bit dirty with little spider cobwebs appearing at its corners.
Walter broke the contract by failing to wipe the sign, but it wasn't a material breach in my opinion (this would be a non-material breach).
When a breaching party does anything (or fails to do something) that goes against the core reason for the contract's signing, it is called a substantial breach of contract.
About material breach:
- A material breach would be if Walter failed to give the sign or if the sign was never turned on.
- However, the sign was a little dusty in this case, with small spider cobwebs emerging at its corners.
- For example, if you hired a contractor to build a house, a substantial breach would be if the contractor failed to complete the project.
For more information about material breach refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/14318546