contestada

stion 3
Which of these is an opinion?
O Katy Perry clearly did not copy Flame's song "Joyful Noise" when creating "Dark Horse"
because the melody of the two songs sounds different.
That song you want to turn up is an example of intellectual property, which means that it's
protected by copyright law.
When deciding whether a song has been copied, judges and juries compare different parts of
the song, such as the melody and rhythm.
In 2019. Katy Perry and the people who worked with her on the number one hit song "Dark
Horse" were taken to court.
Question 4
1 pts

stion 3 Which of these is an opinion O Katy Perry clearly did not copy Flames song Joyful Noise when creating Dark Horse because the melody of the two songs sou class=

Respuesta :

Jinachi

Answer:

Number 1 is the opinion.

Explanation:

Number 2, Number 3, and Number 4 all are supported with sufficient evidence.

In Number 2, the passage refers to a real-life property, the "intellectual property", and therefore supports the sentence, providing a clear argument that the song is copyrighted.

In Number 3, the passage refers to judges and juries comparing different parts of the song. This is also what would happen in a real-life situation since copyright laws have strict policies equipped within them.

In Number 4, it provides an exact date to when the incident happened with Katy Perry and the people who have worked with her.

However, in Number 1, only because "the melody of the two songs sounding different" is not sufficient evidence for the audience to believe that the song is not copyrighted. More evidence is needed in order for this claim to be stronger.

Hope this helped!

~Jinachi~

Otras preguntas