Which statement best explains how a reader can tell that the passage’s narrator is unreliable?

The narrator says he loved the old man, but other events show he is prejudiced against older people.
The narrator claims he is not suffering from madness, but he has no rational reason to kill the old man.
The narrator insists he is uninterested in gold, but he clearly murdered the man for his money.
The narrator says he does not know where he got the idea to kill the old man, but he is lying to protect someone else

Respuesta :

Answer:

B The narrator claims he is not suffering from madness, but he has no rational reason to kill the old man.

Explanation:

I took the assignment

The statement which best explains how a reader can tell that the passage’s narrator is unreliable is that the narrator claims he is not suffering from madness, but he has no rational reason to kill the old man.

Who is an Unreliable Narrator?

This refers to a type of narrator whose descriptions of events in a given story are inconsistent which makes the readers to distrust his narration.

With this in mind and from the complete text, we can see that the reader can tell that the passage’s narrator is unreliable because he claims he is not suffering from madness, but he has no rational reason to kill the old man.

Read more about an unreliable narrator here:

https://brainly.com/question/11317979