contestada

In the lesson, you played the role of a juror in the case of State v. Justin B. Goode. In that case, when the defense attorney cross-examined Suss Pihshawn, his goal was to

question the police officer and challenge the evidence against Mr. Goode
question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state
meet with Suss Pihshawn to discuss strategy without the jury around
meet with Suss Pihshawn to discuss what verdict he will recommend

Respuesta :

10213489

Answer:

B. question the police officer and challenge the evidence against the state

The main duty of defendants in a trial is to defend the accused from potential charges that brought by his/her oppositions. Challenging the evidence from the police/state usually being done to make that evidences become obsolete. If the defendants able to do this, the juries would see the defendant more favorably.

Explanation:

In the situation of cross-examination of Suss Pihshawn, the goal that defense attorney functions to serve would be:

A). question the police officer and challenge the evidence against Mr. Goode.

  • Cross-examination of the witness by the defense attorneys is very crucial in order to challenge the evidence that the prosecution is going to present.
  • This directly impacts the judgment and verdict that the judges are going to take.
  • This questioning helps in bringing out the truth by asking an open-ended question that poses challenges to the existing questions of the prosecution.

Thus, option A is the correct answer.

Learn more about "Law" here:

brainly.com/question/6590381

Otras preguntas